Essential Logic: The Logical Fallacies
-
Introduction
Essential Logic: The Logical Fallacies---Course Introduction (Preview Content)4 Topics|1 Quiz -
LessonsLesson 1: Ad Hominem Abusive (Preview Content)4 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Lesson 2: Ad Hominem Circumstantial (Preview Content)3 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Lesson 3: Tu Quoque3 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Lesson 4: Genetic Fallacy3 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Lesson 5: Appeal to Fear (Argumentum Ad Baculum)3 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Lesson 6: Appeal to Pity (Argumentum Ad Misericordiam)3 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Lesson 7: Mob Appeal (Argumentum Ad Populum)3 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Lesson 8: Snob Appeal3 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Lesson 9: Appeal to Illegitimate Authority (Argumentum Ad Verecundiam)3 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Lesson 10: Chronological Snobbery3 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Lesson 11: Appeal to Ignorance3 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Lesson 12: Irrelevant Goals and Functions3 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Lesson 13: Irrelevant Thesis3 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Lesson 14: Straw Man Fallacy3 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Lesson 15: Begging the Question (Petitio Principii)3 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Lesson 16: Bifurcation (False Dilemma)3 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Lesson 17: Fallacy of Moderation3 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Lesson 18: Is-Ought Fallacy3 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Lesson 19: Fallacy of Composition3 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Lesson 20: Fallacy of Division3 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Lesson 21: Sweeping Generalization (Accident)3 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Lesson 22: Hasty Generalization (Converse Accident)3 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Lesson 23: False Analogy3 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Lesson 24: False Cause3 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Lesson 25: Fake Precision3 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Lesson 26: Equivocation3 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Lesson 27: Accent3 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Lesson 28: Distinction without a Difference3 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Lesson 29: The Frenetic Fallacy (Extra)1 Topic
-
DiscussionsDiscussion: Meet the Students
-
Discussion: Four Students, Full of Fallacies
-
End of Course TestEnd of Course Test: The Logical Fallacies1 Quiz
Essential Logic: The Logical Fallacies—Course Introduction (Preview Content)
Dr. Christopher Perrin introduces this course on the logical fallacies, or informal logic. He distinguishes formal from informal logic and then presents the main approaches to the course, which will involve exploring, classifying, and creating fallacies as a way to mastering them.
Outline of Session
(00:00) Dr. Perrin introduces the video series.
(00:42) Dr. Perrin clarifies the nature of informal logic. It is an “art” and deals with levels of probability and occurs in everyday speech.
(01:07) Formal logic (deductive logic) deals with syllogisms and can deliver greater levels of certainty.
(02:17) Arguments in informal logic are either strong or weak.
(02:40) “Argument” comes from the Latin word argumentum, which means to make something clear on the basis of reason or evidence.
(03:30) We should be humble and treat others with respect even as we argue with them and seek to persuade them.
(05:01) Dr. Perrin introduces the 3 main concepts of the book. Fallacies in informal logic can be summarized under the headings of: relevance, presumption, and clarity.
(05:11) The main question in any debate—What is the issue at hand? This question leads to examining whether statements are committing fallacies of relevance, presumption, or clarity.