Teaching Formal Logic
-
Lessons
Lesson 1: Teaching Logic Restfully with Rigor (Preview Content)4 Topics|1 Quiz -
Lesson 2: Logic as a Core Discipline (Preview Content)3 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Discussion: Logic in One's Life and Study (Preview Content)2 Topics
-
Lesson 3: Formal Logic vs. Informal Logic4 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Lesson 4: The Classical Origin and Medieval Recovery of Logic4 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Lesson 5: Formal Logic and the Three Acts of the Mind (Preview Content)4 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Lesson 6: Translating Arguments into Categorical Form4 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Lesson 7: Relationships of Opposition4 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Lesson 8: Relationships of Equivalence4 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Lesson 9: Categorical Syllogisms3 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Lesson 10: Determining Validity of Syllogisms3 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Lesson 11: Terms and Definitions3 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Lesson 12: Developing the End-of-Year Project4 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Discovery of Deduction Sample LessonsLesson 13: Chapter 5.2 The Square of Opposition2 Topics|1 Quiz
-
Lesson 14: Chapter 6.5 The Relationship of Contraposition2 Topics|1 Quiz
-
End of Course TestEnd of Course Test: Teaching Formal Logic1 Quiz
Discussion Questions
Relationships of Equivalence and Logical Equations
(1) Using the concept of mathematical equations (2 sides of an equation being in perfect, equal balance despite looking different), write an explanation describing why it can be helpful to study relationships of equivalence. Use the answer to this question as you formulate your lesson plan for this chapter.
(2) In what ways can writing and speaking in everyday language make argument translation difficult?
(3) Translate the following into a proposition in categorical form: Anna wasn’t wearing any jewelry. How does this sentence construction make translation difficult?
(4) Employing a different sentence construction, write an equivalent statement.
(5) Using the concepts of logical equivalence, explain why “No dogs are cats” AND “No cats are dogs” are both true, but “All dogs are mammals” is true, while “All mammals are dogs” is NOT true.
(6) Be contemplating the role of immediate inferences in obverse, converse, and contraposition conversions of propositions.